 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
RF isn't clean power? I always heard they were good>>> |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
my91z(5.0 Killer) on June 08, 2001 at 10:27 AM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 12 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
300W not enough for a 10"? posted by jayZbird on June 08, 2001 at 10:11 AM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
I've had my Punch 150 forever and have no complaints at all on it. If I remember right, the bench test slip that came with it said it tested at about 90W/channel @ 12V. That means it puts out about 350W+ bridged mono to a 4-ohm load. I want to get a sub that I can push with as much of that power as it can handle. Maybe the new stuff is made more cheaply than their old stuff, this amp is a rock and I used to have it pushing two Kicker 8-Ohm Compitition 12's(running in parellel) in a 4th order bandpass box tuned for most gain as low as it would go. Used to hit some awesome SPL's in my old 280ZX back in college. I miss that hard hitting really low bass, I'm going to put a single reflex 4th order bandpass box for one 10" in my Z. If I have to, I will run it in an isobaric configuration with two 10's to handle the power. This will reduce my eficiency by 3db though, effectively halfing the sound output, BUT you can drive it with twice the power. Anypoint, my point is I want an efficient 10" that will handle tons of power so I don't have to go isobaric. Mike
  Yeah, I know mine's an N/A! :-)
AIM name: my91z
MSN name: my91z
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
